Abstract
The Non-Identity Problem (NIP) is a philosophical puzzle which challenges our intuitive assumptions and reasoning around the question of our moral obligations towards ‘future people’. This paper explores the significance of the NIP for design, an activity which is necessarily both future-oriented and ethical in nature. Through examination of two thought experiments proposed by philosopher Derek Parfit, this paper makes two contributions to the field of design ethics. Firstly, it raises the profile of the NIP as a topic of interest and for further study in design ethics research. The second is to propose that philosophical thought experiments can play a practical role in equipping designers for real-world challenges. When employed as thinking devices to disrupt our existing ways of thinking, thought experiments open up spaces of creative disequilibrium in which to nurture, exercise, and strengthen mental capacities for approaching the ethically complex challenges of future-oriented design practice.
Keywords
thought experiments; responsible design; non-identity problem; veil of ignorance; design futures
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2024.518
Citation
Buwert, P., and Sinclair, M. (2024) Thought Experiments In The Ethics Of Designing For Future People., in Gray, C., Ciliotta Chehade, E., Hekkert, P., Forlano, L., Ciuccarelli, P., Lloyd, P. (eds.), DRS2024: Boston, 23–28 June, Boston, USA. https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2024.518
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Conference Track
Research Paper
Included in
Thought Experiments In The Ethics Of Designing For Future People.
The Non-Identity Problem (NIP) is a philosophical puzzle which challenges our intuitive assumptions and reasoning around the question of our moral obligations towards ‘future people’. This paper explores the significance of the NIP for design, an activity which is necessarily both future-oriented and ethical in nature. Through examination of two thought experiments proposed by philosopher Derek Parfit, this paper makes two contributions to the field of design ethics. Firstly, it raises the profile of the NIP as a topic of interest and for further study in design ethics research. The second is to propose that philosophical thought experiments can play a practical role in equipping designers for real-world challenges. When employed as thinking devices to disrupt our existing ways of thinking, thought experiments open up spaces of creative disequilibrium in which to nurture, exercise, and strengthen mental capacities for approaching the ethically complex challenges of future-oriented design practice.