Abstract

Public Sector Innovation Labs (PSI labs) have been increasingly established globally in response to the growing complexity of social issues. These labs typically adopt design-oriented approaches, which may engender potential conflicts with existing organizational cultures due to their exploratory nature. While this has led to the discussion on the organizational perspective to overcome such obstacles, previous research has emphasized the managerial layer, and there are limited discussions on establishing legitimacy on the part of PSI labs. To fill this gap, this paper examines the process of establishing legitimacy—how PSI Labs can gain approval, support, or continuous project opportunities from management or other departments—through a study of five PSI Labs in Finland. This paper presents three main points. First, establishing legitimacy is a dynamic, ad hoc process that emerges from daily design practices and utilizes provisional circumstances and resources, rather than a planned outcome. Second, we identify three categories of approaches used by PSI labs to gain legitimacy: promotion, which disseminates achieved results; collaboration, which involves organizational actors in design processes; and networking, which creates a mutual support system. Finally, we argue that the process of establishing legitimacy overlaps with the process of knowledge creation, which leads to the expansion of tacit and explicit knowledge about design within an organization.

Keywords

PSI labs, design in the public sector, legitimacy, knowledge creation

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Conference Track

fullpapers

Share

COinS
 
Oct 9th, 9:00 AM

How do PSI Labs establish legitimacy?: Dynamics, approaches, and knowledge creation

Public Sector Innovation Labs (PSI labs) have been increasingly established globally in response to the growing complexity of social issues. These labs typically adopt design-oriented approaches, which may engender potential conflicts with existing organizational cultures due to their exploratory nature. While this has led to the discussion on the organizational perspective to overcome such obstacles, previous research has emphasized the managerial layer, and there are limited discussions on establishing legitimacy on the part of PSI labs. To fill this gap, this paper examines the process of establishing legitimacy—how PSI Labs can gain approval, support, or continuous project opportunities from management or other departments—through a study of five PSI Labs in Finland. This paper presents three main points. First, establishing legitimacy is a dynamic, ad hoc process that emerges from daily design practices and utilizes provisional circumstances and resources, rather than a planned outcome. Second, we identify three categories of approaches used by PSI labs to gain legitimacy: promotion, which disseminates achieved results; collaboration, which involves organizational actors in design processes; and networking, which creates a mutual support system. Finally, we argue that the process of establishing legitimacy overlaps with the process of knowledge creation, which leads to the expansion of tacit and explicit knowledge about design within an organization.

 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.