Abstract

Design practice exists as a complex and varied ecology of practitioners, methodologies and outcomes, one that harbors varying internal biases, tangents and conceptual stances. As designers interface with outside practitioners in science, engineering and theory, they are confronted with both problems and opportunities from these external domains that can appear quite foreign in both approach and outcome. Design process and its resultant biases are distinct and yet malleable and these unique aspects should be emphasized when confronting and collaborating with outside disciplines. In acknowledging our own disciplinary and project specific values, we must remain mindful of the risk of ceding authority to more pragmatic or quantifiable concerns from collaborators outside of the design discipline. Negotiating these collaborations requires a careful attention to communication, methodologies and how project goals are defined and articulated. In analyzing the procedures, methodology and resulting projects from an interdisciplinary design led research group, this paper will offer insight into the nature of interdisciplinary conversations and translations within the context of design education and offer examples of design-led collaborative research. This paper will argue that identifying, amplifying and communicating the conceptual, aesthetic, intellectual and emotional goals of a project is a crucial component to fruitful design-led research collaboration.

Share

COinS
 
Jun 16th, 12:00 AM

Design ecologies, locating and amplifying individual motivations in a collaborative research environment

Design practice exists as a complex and varied ecology of practitioners, methodologies and outcomes, one that harbors varying internal biases, tangents and conceptual stances. As designers interface with outside practitioners in science, engineering and theory, they are confronted with both problems and opportunities from these external domains that can appear quite foreign in both approach and outcome. Design process and its resultant biases are distinct and yet malleable and these unique aspects should be emphasized when confronting and collaborating with outside disciplines. In acknowledging our own disciplinary and project specific values, we must remain mindful of the risk of ceding authority to more pragmatic or quantifiable concerns from collaborators outside of the design discipline. Negotiating these collaborations requires a careful attention to communication, methodologies and how project goals are defined and articulated. In analyzing the procedures, methodology and resulting projects from an interdisciplinary design led research group, this paper will offer insight into the nature of interdisciplinary conversations and translations within the context of design education and offer examples of design-led collaborative research. This paper will argue that identifying, amplifying and communicating the conceptual, aesthetic, intellectual and emotional goals of a project is a crucial component to fruitful design-led research collaboration.

 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.