Visualisation for citizen participation: Data practices in the Copenhagen Climate Citizens' Assembly
Abstract
The recent popularisation of data and their visualisation has offered new opportunities for spaces of citizen participation around contested issues, such as climate assemblies. The potential of data visualisation in opening and supporting discussions has been widely recognised, but so has the risk it carries of naturalising certain perspectives and delegitimising others. Still, the roles played by data visualisation in the specific context of climate assemblies remain unaddressed. This paper investigates those roles through field observation and desk research around a case study, the Københavnernes Klimaborgerting. The study explores which data were visualised, how, by who and why. What emerges is that data visualisations were mostly used as top-down tools to frame the process rather than objects mobilised for discussion. The findings highlight the need for more participatory approaches in the data work done in climate assemblies, in line with the democratic principles of participation underlying those processes.
Keywords
data visualisation, citizen participation, climate assemblies, pluralism
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2026.1296
Citation
Dell'Orto, D., de Götzen, A., and Jacomy, M. (2026) Visualisation for citizen participation: Data practices in the Copenhagen Climate Citizens' Assembly, in Simeone, L., Gray, C. M., Verhoeven, A., de Götzen, A., Bakırlıoğlu, Y., Zohar, H., Stead, M., and Buwert, P. (eds.), DRS2026: Edinburgh, 8–12 June, Edinburgh, United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2026.1296
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Included in
Visualisation for citizen participation: Data practices in the Copenhagen Climate Citizens' Assembly
The recent popularisation of data and their visualisation has offered new opportunities for spaces of citizen participation around contested issues, such as climate assemblies. The potential of data visualisation in opening and supporting discussions has been widely recognised, but so has the risk it carries of naturalising certain perspectives and delegitimising others. Still, the roles played by data visualisation in the specific context of climate assemblies remain unaddressed. This paper investigates those roles through field observation and desk research around a case study, the Københavnernes Klimaborgerting. The study explores which data were visualised, how, by who and why. What emerges is that data visualisations were mostly used as top-down tools to frame the process rather than objects mobilised for discussion. The findings highlight the need for more participatory approaches in the data work done in climate assemblies, in line with the democratic principles of participation underlying those processes.