Abstract

This article examines the epistemological, political, and practical challenges of transdisciplinarity in a participatory design project with agroforestry family farmers in São Paulo, Brazil, within the Design for Biodiversity initiative. By bringing together designers, scientists, and farmers, the project demonstrates how participatory design operates as a negotiation between institutional knowledge and vernacular expertise. Farmers’ experiential knowledge informed design decisions and interpretations of socioecological dynamics. Findings reveal tensions not only in interactions with farmers, requiring communication adapted to accessible language and local realities, but also within the academic team, due to differing worldviews and validation standards. Through a design-led action research approach, the study argues that such frictions are productive mechanisms that foster regenerative futures. Embracing conflict and co-construction reposition design as an agent of territorial autonomy, community resilience, and socio-ecological regeneration, expanding its role beyond sustainability toward ecological restoration and recognizing non-academic knowledge as central to situated design outcomes.

Keywords

Transdisciplinary Design, Participatory Design Methodologies, Agroforestry Systems, Regenerative Futures

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Share

COinS
 
Jun 8th, 9:00 AM Jun 12th, 5:00 PM

Transdisciplinarity in practice: Challenges and transformative potentials of Participatory Design in Sociobiodiversity contexts

This article examines the epistemological, political, and practical challenges of transdisciplinarity in a participatory design project with agroforestry family farmers in São Paulo, Brazil, within the Design for Biodiversity initiative. By bringing together designers, scientists, and farmers, the project demonstrates how participatory design operates as a negotiation between institutional knowledge and vernacular expertise. Farmers’ experiential knowledge informed design decisions and interpretations of socioecological dynamics. Findings reveal tensions not only in interactions with farmers, requiring communication adapted to accessible language and local realities, but also within the academic team, due to differing worldviews and validation standards. Through a design-led action research approach, the study argues that such frictions are productive mechanisms that foster regenerative futures. Embracing conflict and co-construction reposition design as an agent of territorial autonomy, community resilience, and socio-ecological regeneration, expanding its role beyond sustainability toward ecological restoration and recognizing non-academic knowledge as central to situated design outcomes.

 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.