Abstract

Recent research has established the necessity to understand sound as a service design material since its unique qualities can enhance representational design methods and contribute to the understanding, communication, and collaboration in designing complex service situations. However, much is still unknown about the role sound plays in the service design process and how the nuances related to its representational capacity influence collaborative sensemaking. This paper explores these nuances by developing a framework that allows inclusion of sound in service design practices regardless of sound-related skill level. The framework was developed based on empirical input from a master level course in service design with a specialised focus on sound. It categorises representational capacity of sound as divergent (auditory representations) and convergent (auditory prototypes) and shows how different conceptual levels (abstract vs. concrete) can have meaning-related implications (denotative vs. connotative) in collaborative design work.

Keywords

sound, auditory representations, auditory prototypes, meaning, service design

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Share

COinS
 
Jun 8th, 9:00 AM Jun 12th, 5:00 PM

Sounding out service: explaining representational capacity of sound in service design

Recent research has established the necessity to understand sound as a service design material since its unique qualities can enhance representational design methods and contribute to the understanding, communication, and collaboration in designing complex service situations. However, much is still unknown about the role sound plays in the service design process and how the nuances related to its representational capacity influence collaborative sensemaking. This paper explores these nuances by developing a framework that allows inclusion of sound in service design practices regardless of sound-related skill level. The framework was developed based on empirical input from a master level course in service design with a specialised focus on sound. It categorises representational capacity of sound as divergent (auditory representations) and convergent (auditory prototypes) and shows how different conceptual levels (abstract vs. concrete) can have meaning-related implications (denotative vs. connotative) in collaborative design work.

 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.