Abstract

Research on generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in cultural design has primarily focused on generative control and creative efficiency, often overlooking the misalignment between AI task definition and cultural creation. This study explores how GenAI can be culturally adapted within traditional pattern-making practices. Using an ethnographically informed generative probe, field experiments were conducted in the Huayao cross-stitch community, which practices a form of Chinese intangible cultural heritage. The findings reveal how cultural practitioners negotiate creative logic and cultural judgment when collaborating with AI, identifying four key orientations: liveliness, locality, creation-in-progress, and community creativity. Building on these insights, the paper redefines AI’s role as a generative reflexive actor and introduces the perspective of Culturally Situated Task Definition (CSTD) to explain how cultural tasks are redefined through the mutual shaping of technology and practice, advancing an understanding of the mechanisms underlying AI’s cultural adaptation and meaning co-construction.

Keywords

Generative AI; Cultural Situatedness; Task Definition; Huayao Cross-Stitch

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Share

COinS
 
Jun 8th, 9:00 AM Jun 12th, 5:00 PM

Toward a culturally situated perspective: Rethinking the role of AI in intangible cultural heritage pattern creation

Research on generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in cultural design has primarily focused on generative control and creative efficiency, often overlooking the misalignment between AI task definition and cultural creation. This study explores how GenAI can be culturally adapted within traditional pattern-making practices. Using an ethnographically informed generative probe, field experiments were conducted in the Huayao cross-stitch community, which practices a form of Chinese intangible cultural heritage. The findings reveal how cultural practitioners negotiate creative logic and cultural judgment when collaborating with AI, identifying four key orientations: liveliness, locality, creation-in-progress, and community creativity. Building on these insights, the paper redefines AI’s role as a generative reflexive actor and introduces the perspective of Culturally Situated Task Definition (CSTD) to explain how cultural tasks are redefined through the mutual shaping of technology and practice, advancing an understanding of the mechanisms underlying AI’s cultural adaptation and meaning co-construction.

 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.