Abstract

At the core of creative thinking lies the dynamic interplay between divergent and convergent thinking, an ability especially critical in team co-creation within design education. As generative AI tools increasingly integrate into educational design settings, this study investigates the practical impact of such tools on team creativity by comparing two support models introduced at different design stages in empirical workshop settings. One group utilized AI during the ideation stage to assist with idea generation, while the other group employed AI in the concept storyboarding stage to support visual expression of ideas. Assessment using the Creativity Support Index (CSI) revealed that integrating AI tools during the ideation phase quickly provided abundant and diverse stimuli, significantly reducing cognitive load during divergent thinking and enhancing idea diversity. In contrast, the team using AI in the storyboarding stage benefited from improved visualization and refinement of concepts, facilitating clearer and more precise consensus during convergent thinking. However, this also introduced greater communication costs and collaboration complexity. This study highlights both the advantages and challenges of using generative AI tools at different stages of team creativity development and recommends strategically integrating AI tools to leverage their stage-specific strengths, ultimately enhancing overall creative performance from ideation to visual concept development.

Keywords

Generative AI; Team creativity; Design education; Ideation

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Conference Track

Track 12 - Design Education

Share

COinS
 
Dec 2nd, 9:00 AM Dec 5th, 5:00 PM

The Impact of AI Tools on Team Creativity: An Empirical Study in a Design Education Setting

At the core of creative thinking lies the dynamic interplay between divergent and convergent thinking, an ability especially critical in team co-creation within design education. As generative AI tools increasingly integrate into educational design settings, this study investigates the practical impact of such tools on team creativity by comparing two support models introduced at different design stages in empirical workshop settings. One group utilized AI during the ideation stage to assist with idea generation, while the other group employed AI in the concept storyboarding stage to support visual expression of ideas. Assessment using the Creativity Support Index (CSI) revealed that integrating AI tools during the ideation phase quickly provided abundant and diverse stimuli, significantly reducing cognitive load during divergent thinking and enhancing idea diversity. In contrast, the team using AI in the storyboarding stage benefited from improved visualization and refinement of concepts, facilitating clearer and more precise consensus during convergent thinking. However, this also introduced greater communication costs and collaboration complexity. This study highlights both the advantages and challenges of using generative AI tools at different stages of team creativity development and recommends strategically integrating AI tools to leverage their stage-specific strengths, ultimately enhancing overall creative performance from ideation to visual concept development.

 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.