Abstract

Current sustainable food packaging often emphasises material innovation at the expense of user behaviours role across the life cycle, creating a “sustainability paradox” where environmental gains are offset by behavioural misalignment. This study employs behavioural design theory in a two-stage investigation to examine how packaging design shapes user behaviour. Field research at Xiangtan Universitys snack street identified user challenges for four food packaging categories: ready-to-eat dry food, ready-to-eat wet food, non-ready-to-eat dry food, and non-ready-to-eat wet food, and corresponding behaviours were extracted for each type of food packaging. In Stage 2, two comparative experiments (traditional packaging versus design-guided intervention) involved 10 participants per group completing tasks, evaluated through behavioural observation and the System Usability Scale. The results reveal a cognitive mismatch between designer intent and user perception: Group B’s ergonomic arc-shaped handle, which aligns with user behavioural habits, achieved a 90% success rate in tasks such as handling and recycling, whereas Group A’s “four-finger imitation” handle, limited by unclear visual cues, attained only a 10% success rate. SUS scores indicated significantly lower learn ability in the behavioural guidance design group (Experiment A: 50 versus 94.17 for the control). These findings underscore that user behavioural habits are the primary determinant of packaging sustainability, rendering material innovation alone insufficient. An implicit design-behaviour interaction mechanism is crucial to address this challenge. By moving beyond a material-focused design approach, this study proposes a bidirectional behaviour-design optimization framework, providing actionable guidance for plastic reduction initiatives in campus environments and similar contexts.

Keywords

Sustainable design; Take-out food packaging; Behavioural design; User behaviour habits

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Conference Track

Track 8 - Circular/Sustainable Design

Share

COinS
 
Dec 2nd, 9:00 AM Dec 5th, 5:00 PM

The Bidirectional Relationship Between Behavioural Guidance Design and User Behaviour Habits: Implications for Sustainable Packaging

Current sustainable food packaging often emphasises material innovation at the expense of user behaviours role across the life cycle, creating a “sustainability paradox” where environmental gains are offset by behavioural misalignment. This study employs behavioural design theory in a two-stage investigation to examine how packaging design shapes user behaviour. Field research at Xiangtan Universitys snack street identified user challenges for four food packaging categories: ready-to-eat dry food, ready-to-eat wet food, non-ready-to-eat dry food, and non-ready-to-eat wet food, and corresponding behaviours were extracted for each type of food packaging. In Stage 2, two comparative experiments (traditional packaging versus design-guided intervention) involved 10 participants per group completing tasks, evaluated through behavioural observation and the System Usability Scale. The results reveal a cognitive mismatch between designer intent and user perception: Group B’s ergonomic arc-shaped handle, which aligns with user behavioural habits, achieved a 90% success rate in tasks such as handling and recycling, whereas Group A’s “four-finger imitation” handle, limited by unclear visual cues, attained only a 10% success rate. SUS scores indicated significantly lower learn ability in the behavioural guidance design group (Experiment A: 50 versus 94.17 for the control). These findings underscore that user behavioural habits are the primary determinant of packaging sustainability, rendering material innovation alone insufficient. An implicit design-behaviour interaction mechanism is crucial to address this challenge. By moving beyond a material-focused design approach, this study proposes a bidirectional behaviour-design optimization framework, providing actionable guidance for plastic reduction initiatives in campus environments and similar contexts.

 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.