Abstract

Typically, when evaluating iconic typefaces, we investigate the degree to which they communicate well-established connotative narratives. Helvetica, for example, is an icon of simplicity and clarity and so, is applied across various designs to exude similar tones. Bodoni, a showpiece of Neoclassicism, detailing and adornment facilitated by technological advancement during the 18th century Industrial Revolution, often appears in designs suited to premium brands. Iconic typefaces such as these are tied to their symbolism; it appears that their symbolic ‘myths’ have ‘always been so.’ As I demonstrate however, there are examples of iconic typefaces whose myths are in fact entirely fabricated, illusionary; 'borrowed' from the origins of other media, to the extent that they appear more real than their true historical origin. They are, I argue, examples of Baudrillard’s simulacra. While it is possible to argue that typographic simulacra are deceptive imposters, in this paper, I argue that they may in fact also offer designers a way to look at and apply iconic type that breaks with clichéd connotations attached to it. Simulacra can offer an absence of narrative; a clearing out of sorts, whereby designers generate new connotations – breathing new life into stayed typefaces.

Keywords

Rhetoric of typography, Typographic simulacra, Type as myth, Baudrillard, Barthes

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Conference Track

researchpapers

Share

COinS
 
Jun 12th, 9:00 AM Jun 14th, 5:00 PM

The illusive type: Hunting typographic simulacra

Typically, when evaluating iconic typefaces, we investigate the degree to which they communicate well-established connotative narratives. Helvetica, for example, is an icon of simplicity and clarity and so, is applied across various designs to exude similar tones. Bodoni, a showpiece of Neoclassicism, detailing and adornment facilitated by technological advancement during the 18th century Industrial Revolution, often appears in designs suited to premium brands. Iconic typefaces such as these are tied to their symbolism; it appears that their symbolic ‘myths’ have ‘always been so.’ As I demonstrate however, there are examples of iconic typefaces whose myths are in fact entirely fabricated, illusionary; 'borrowed' from the origins of other media, to the extent that they appear more real than their true historical origin. They are, I argue, examples of Baudrillard’s simulacra. While it is possible to argue that typographic simulacra are deceptive imposters, in this paper, I argue that they may in fact also offer designers a way to look at and apply iconic type that breaks with clichéd connotations attached to it. Simulacra can offer an absence of narrative; a clearing out of sorts, whereby designers generate new connotations – breathing new life into stayed typefaces.

 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.