Abstract

This paper explores notions of ‘the virtual facsimile’, the copy and representation at a practice-oriented level and discusses them with relation to notions of ‘tracking’, ‘recording’ and ‘annotating’ design and design history through digital means. It begins by asking the question: if previsualisation software packages are useful in the representation phase of a construction project, how useful are they as markers and postvisualisation tools for pre-existing structures? Indeed, once modelled, how far departed from the original is the facsimile? Is it possible to extend the usefulness of these tools to include the representation of that which is already built and that which is significant for its architectonic and historiographic value? It argues that 3-dimensional software packages can be used as photographic markers of significant buildings, i.e., a virtual library of historically relevant spaces. While it is impossible to physically immerse ones’ self in these spaces, an exact record can be created which allows the viewer to experience the space a(physically)(as opposed to photographically). Using Elizabeth Grozs’s ideas about the boundaries between the virtual and the real as a starting point, I am interested in exploring the “utility of the facsimile or copy" in a research and practice-based environment whereby new media can become an implicit part of conservation practice. This will be shown through the re-creation, representation and an analysis of the end result of the re-creation of a number of historically significant “physical” spaces.

Share

COinS
 
Nov 17th, 12:00 AM

Reading Digital Clones in the Conservation Process.

This paper explores notions of ‘the virtual facsimile’, the copy and representation at a practice-oriented level and discusses them with relation to notions of ‘tracking’, ‘recording’ and ‘annotating’ design and design history through digital means. It begins by asking the question: if previsualisation software packages are useful in the representation phase of a construction project, how useful are they as markers and postvisualisation tools for pre-existing structures? Indeed, once modelled, how far departed from the original is the facsimile? Is it possible to extend the usefulness of these tools to include the representation of that which is already built and that which is significant for its architectonic and historiographic value? It argues that 3-dimensional software packages can be used as photographic markers of significant buildings, i.e., a virtual library of historically relevant spaces. While it is impossible to physically immerse ones’ self in these spaces, an exact record can be created which allows the viewer to experience the space a(physically)(as opposed to photographically). Using Elizabeth Grozs’s ideas about the boundaries between the virtual and the real as a starting point, I am interested in exploring the “utility of the facsimile or copy" in a research and practice-based environment whereby new media can become an implicit part of conservation practice. This will be shown through the re-creation, representation and an analysis of the end result of the re-creation of a number of historically significant “physical” spaces.

 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.