Abstract
Can Western design theory be a universal panacea? Celebrating Design Issues' 40-year legacy (1984-2025), "The Unfolding Culture" exhibition asks how culture will shape design's future, yet overlooks whose culture dominates design discourse. Through critical analysis of Design Issues, the author reveals three structural absences that question theoretical universalism: (1) Medium constraints—text-based format systematically excludes sound, video, and material-based knowledge production, eliminating epistemologies that resist textualization; (2) Temporal lag—non-Western topics arrive decades late, revealing one-way delayed recognition rather than dialogue; (3) Divergent concerns—East and West simultaneously focus on fundamentally different design questions yet lack mechanisms for synchronous exchange, resulting in parallel monologues rather than cross-cultural conversation. These absences expose design theory's provinciality: decades of isolated development, occasional belated recognition, but no sustained dialogue. The author argues for infrastructures enabling real-time, reciprocal, pluriversal conversation across divergent concerns.
Keywords
temporal lag, non-synchronous exchange, divergent concerns, cross-cultural dialogue
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2026.1380
Citation
Yang, Y. (2026) Absent Voices, Alternative Futures: What Design Issues Didn't Say About Design (1984-2025), in Simeone, L., Gray, C. M., Verhoeven, A., de Götzen, A., Bakırlıoğlu, Y., Zohar, H., Stead, M., and Buwert, P. (eds.), DRS2026: Edinburgh, 8–12 June, Edinburgh, United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2026.1380
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Included in
Absent Voices, Alternative Futures: What Design Issues Didn't Say About Design (1984-2025)
Can Western design theory be a universal panacea? Celebrating Design Issues' 40-year legacy (1984-2025), "The Unfolding Culture" exhibition asks how culture will shape design's future, yet overlooks whose culture dominates design discourse. Through critical analysis of Design Issues, the author reveals three structural absences that question theoretical universalism: (1) Medium constraints—text-based format systematically excludes sound, video, and material-based knowledge production, eliminating epistemologies that resist textualization; (2) Temporal lag—non-Western topics arrive decades late, revealing one-way delayed recognition rather than dialogue; (3) Divergent concerns—East and West simultaneously focus on fundamentally different design questions yet lack mechanisms for synchronous exchange, resulting in parallel monologues rather than cross-cultural conversation. These absences expose design theory's provinciality: decades of isolated development, occasional belated recognition, but no sustained dialogue. The author argues for infrastructures enabling real-time, reciprocal, pluriversal conversation across divergent concerns.