Abstract
This research examines the design studio as a form of architectural design research. Architectural and Urban Design studios have been operating as epistemic laboratories in which the processes of evaluating wicked problems, proposing design interventions, and iteratively testing the fit between the brief and design intersect to generate new knowledge. It is often impractical to evaluate the long-term implications of built works on complex, interrelated societal issues, as such assessments are time-consuming, costly, and rarely yield transferable insights. Hence, many architects and urban designers investigate design opportunities in design studios, allowing them to test, reframe and expand their understanding of a wicked problem in a less constrained yet more feasible way. Anchored in Schön’s theory of Reflective Practice, this Architectural and Urban Design research on postgraduate design studios analyses how designing act as wicked problem reframers, and reveal how designing reorganises understandings of complex architectural questions.
Keywords
architectural design research, urban design research, design studios, wicked problems
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2026.1609
Citation
Tan, L., and Karakiewicz, J. (2026) Testing the unbuilt: Design studios as research for Wicked Opportunities, in Simeone, L., Gray, C. M., Verhoeven, A., de Götzen, A., Bakırlıoğlu, Y., Zohar, H., Stead, M., and Buwert, P. (eds.), DRS2026: Edinburgh, 8–12 June, Edinburgh, United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2026.1609
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Included in
Testing the unbuilt: Design studios as research for Wicked Opportunities
This research examines the design studio as a form of architectural design research. Architectural and Urban Design studios have been operating as epistemic laboratories in which the processes of evaluating wicked problems, proposing design interventions, and iteratively testing the fit between the brief and design intersect to generate new knowledge. It is often impractical to evaluate the long-term implications of built works on complex, interrelated societal issues, as such assessments are time-consuming, costly, and rarely yield transferable insights. Hence, many architects and urban designers investigate design opportunities in design studios, allowing them to test, reframe and expand their understanding of a wicked problem in a less constrained yet more feasible way. Anchored in Schön’s theory of Reflective Practice, this Architectural and Urban Design research on postgraduate design studios analyses how designing act as wicked problem reframers, and reveal how designing reorganises understandings of complex architectural questions.